A Brief Comparison between Hospital Defibrillators and Public AED

In contrast to the manual defibrillators traditionally utilized in hospital operating rooms and emergency departments, automated external defibrillators, also known as AEDs, are portable medical devices that diagnose specific cardiac arrhythmias and administer electric shocks to defibrillate them and are medical devices that can be used by laypersons to resuscitate patients in cardiac arrest. What are the similarities and differences between them and AED hospital products?

Something Need to Know about Defibrillators

In cardiac arrest, defibrillation and CPR with an automated external defibrillator (AED) is the most effective way to stop sudden death only during the “golden 4 minutes” of optimal resuscitation time.

This is due to the continuous development and maturity of AED technology, relying on innovative technology companies like Mindray. If only wait for medical personnel to arrive and then wait for disposal, the mortality rate of the patient will be greatly increased.

In terms of functionality, hospital defibrillators can not only deliver electric shocks as AEDs, but can also have functions not supported by public AEDs, such as rhythm (delivering electrical impulses to stimulate heart contractions), synchronized cardioversion, and patient monitoring. However, the cost of using a hospital defibrillator, as well as its floor space and size, clearly make it unsuitable for widespread distribution in public settings.

Given the cost of maintenance and ease of use, hospital defibrillators are not a good choice for public use. Most importantly, hospital defibrillators should not be operated by untrained non-healthcare personnel. This could result in a very serious accident. This is where the role of Mindray’s high-end AED comes into play.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button